【one might run around the house crossword clue】How Attorneys and Expert Witnesses Can Effectively Manage Each Other in Domestic Violence Cases
Witness stand/Photo: BigStock
Witness stand/Photo: BigStock
It’s a slogan we all know: Customer satisfaction is one might run around the house crossword cluepriority number one. No different than a customer-salesperson relationship, a client embroiled in a domestic violence case who hires an attorney is looking for a positive result. Nonetheless, the attorney needs to manage the client’s expectations by properly informing the client of the intricacies and unpredictability of the legal process, and the client needs to understand the realistic potential outcomes.
If the lawsuit necessitates that an expert be retained, the attorney and expert need to have a relationship built on trust. This is particularly important so they can each manage the other’s expectations. How can this be accomplished? Generally, managing is a proactive, continuous effort that will change depending upon new information and developments in the case. While the attorney and client need to be on the same page regarding the client’s expectations—which may change over time—the expert is not an advocate for the client. The expert is like an umpire calling balls and strikes, without regard to which side wins.
Attorney-Expert Managing Guidelines
Before retaining an expert for the first time, an attorney should interview the expert about prior cases, prior findings by the court on their work, any bias they may have, as well as the education and training of the expert in the area of expertise being contemplated. Even after interviewing a potential expert there are pitfalls. An expert may tout himself or herself as having a specialty category based upon insufficient criteria, so the attorney must actually be familiar with the specialty guidelines and ethics in the expert’s field. Failure to do so may result in having the expert being disqualified later on.
In domestic violence cases, a psychologist must not only have been involved in these kinds of cases, especially where child custody is involved, but they must also have specialized training in the field. For example, domestic violence against an adult may involve allegations of abuse against a child. An expert must have the training to be able to opine on the risks to a child. Experience absent training is insufficient. While an expert must have a working knowledge of the legal process, the expert should have practical experience, not just academic or trial-support experience.
Attorneys must let the expert know their expectations at the outset. Does the expert have trauma expertise? Is it for both adult and child trauma? The specific parameters of the retention must be discussed and agreed upon. If an attorney wants an opinion on an issue that may not be feasible for the expert to address, they must discuss the parameters of what is possible. For example, the expert may be asked to opine on whether a particular act of domestic violence occurred versus being asked to opine if the plaintiff is a victim of domestic violence as a battered spouse. The standards for opining on whether any particular incident occurred may be impossible for the expert, while the expert may be able to provide a battered spouse’s evaluation and opine on the impact of the abuse. The attorney needs to affirmatively let the expert know what specific expectations they have. In turn, the expert must be forthcoming as to what they can ethically do if an evaluation shows the plaintiff to be battered.
If a report is based upon a review of documents the attorney must let the expert know they will not be allowed to do an actual evaluation and must inquire as to the limits on opinions based solely upon review of documents. Likewise, it must be clear how the expert will proceed—if at all—if the expert’s findings do not meet the initial expectations of the attorney. Generally, no report will be written as all written reports may be discoverable.
Story continues
Expert-Attorney Managing Guidelines
While it is common for the attorney to ask lots of questions of a prospective expert, it is equally important that the expert know precisely what questions the attorney wants answered. Does the attorney want the expert to opine on domestic violence in general and/or domestic violence in this particular case? Is the expert expected to offer opinions regarding the effects of domestic violence on children? Assuredly, prospective experts must be interviewers as well as interviewees.
Experts must find out if the attorney will be able to provide them with the pertinent information to enable the expert to apply their unique insight into the contours of that aspect of the case that is their expertise.
As information and depositions are reviewed, it is important for the expert not to rely solely on prior discussions with the attorney, but rather on the materials reviewed. Experts must request that the attorney apprise them of changes in circumstances of the case as they occur. This enables them to identify what additional information may be needed in order to provide a more comprehensive report.
If the attorney becomes frustrated, the expert must be able to articulate that the expert’s role has not changed. Emotional, financial, and interpersonal pressures are ever-present in domestic violence cases. The expert must nevertheless be steadfast. The goals that the attorney and expert agreed to initially are the ones in force unless they are changed by consent and based only on sound, rational reasons. To impulsively change goals midstream because of attorney—or client—frustration will not help the case and may be asking the expert to compromise their ethics.
The credibility of experts will be enhanced if they can show thoroughness and true expertise. As in any business, experts should never make commitments that they cannot honor. The age-old adage “Under-promise and over-deliver” holds very true for expert witnesses in domestic violence cases.
In a nutshell: Before being retained, and thereafter, attorneys and experts must be unwavering in their dedication to being transparent and forthright with each other. Ultimately, open and detailed communication between the attorney and expert is not just desirous but essential to successfully litigate a domestic violence case.
Daniel Pollack
is professor in the School of Social Work at Yeshiva University.
Toby Kleinman
is a partner in the law firm of Adler & Kleinman.
View comments
-
Top Ranked Growth Stocks to Buy for June 4thIs There Now An Opportunity In Sotherly Hotels Inc. (NASDAQ:SOHO)?Genesco (GCO) Gains But Lags Market: What You Should KnowJPMorgan (JPM) Signs Deal to Acquire Fintech Start-up 55ipCar rental firm Hertz gets more time from lenders to avoid bankruptcyCould coronavirus trigger a recession?Rohingya must have choice on going to Bangladesh island - UN refugee agencyThis Broker Just Slashed Their Freelance.com SA (EPA:ALFRE) Earnings ForecastsA design trends forecaster calls the coronavirus “an amazing grace for the planet”Rand Capital Corp. to Host Earnings Call
下一篇:Why the Earnings Surprise Streak Could Continue for Dick's (DKS)
- ·Why Is Vornado (VNO) Up 1.7% Since Last Earnings Report?
- ·Crypto Influencers Are Following the Beauty Playbook – Even if They Don’t Know It
- ·Pfizer-BioNTech seeks full marketing approval from UK for COVID-19 vaccine
- ·Apple's New Deal With Amazon Prime Video Is a Game Changer
- ·SHAREHOLDER ALERT: CLAIMSFILER REMINDS FSCT, WFC INVESTORS of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuits
- ·Cytokinetics (CYTK) Reports Q4 Loss, Misses Revenue Estimates
- ·ServiceNow (NOW) Set to Acquire AI-Focused Startup Element AI
- ·DCP Midstream to Participate in Investor Conferences
- ·What Cineworld Group plc’s (LON:CINE) ROE Can Tell Us
- ·Sick of Roaming Fees? Now Your Carrier Is Hurting Too
- ·Medical Gloves Market Research Report: By Raw Material, Application, Sterility, Type, Distribution Channel, End User - Global Industry Analysis and Growth Forecast to 2030
- ·With EPS Growth And More, Anchorstone Holdings (HKG:1592) Is Interesting
- ·Insights on the Surgical Sealant/Tissue Patch Global Market to 2025 - Key Drivers and Restraints
- ·Acadia Pharmaceuticals (ACAD) Reports Q3 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates
- ·Oil Price Fundamental Daily Forecast – OPEC+ to Discuss Production Cut Extension to September 1
- ·E-mini Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM) Futures Technical Analysis – Strong Over 27741, Weak Under 27400
- ·JPMorgan (JPM) Plans for 20% Rise in 2020-end Trading Bonus
- ·Harvard and Yale Are No Match for the Bears
- ·EUR/USD Bullish Break Kick Starts Reversal to 1.13?
- ·Pinduoduo’s AI strawberry competition offers glimpse of “one-click planting”
- ·AUD/USD Weekly Price Forecast – Australian Dollar Rallies Significantly For The Week
- ·Wells Fargo CEO tells Congress bank has doubled down on regulatory issues
- ·XFC to Live Stream Inaugural Try-Outs in Michigan on Sept 12 Live on Location at Team SFS-Scorpion Fighting System
- ·Where Do Hedge Funds Stand On Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (PMBC)?
- ·Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. to Host Earnings Call
- ·Trust Stamp Prepares to Pursue Direct Public Listing on Euronext Growth Market
- ·Trump's coronavirus stimulus is still evolving. Here's what it should include, experts say
- ·Global Compression Garments Market – Analysis By Product Type, By End User, By Region, By Country (2020 Edition): Market Insights, COVID-19 Impact, Competition and Forecast (2020-2025)
- ·Guardant Health Announces Pricing of Upsized Public Offering
- ·Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) Stock Moves -1.58%: What You Should Know
- ·Here's What World Precision Machinery Limited's (SGX:B49) P/E Is Telling Us
- ·How Does TCF Financial's (NASDAQ:TCF) P/E Compare To Its Industry, After The Share Price Drop?
- ·What's in Store for Ambarella (AMBA) This Earnings Season?
- ·Vineyard Wind picks GE turbines for Massachusetts offshore wind farm
- ·Is Now An Opportune Moment To Examine Unicaja Banco, S.A. (BME:UNI)?
- ·European Stocks Seen Higher; U.S. Election in Spotlight